Anunnaki Chanellings

Anunnaki Electric Motor
Anunnaki “Angel” collects Rays of Divine light and produces Math Symbol Pi from result of communion with higher power.
Enlil (God of Airspace) – Anunnaki depiction from Sumeria

Hello my name is GOSH I ANUNNAKI (of those who from Heaven came to Earth). I have had that sentiment since I discovered my ANTEKK Shebala (Antigravity) technology. I have not yet found my Hebats (Ladies of the skies) but do mostly date HAB [Horny Ass B1tch] & HAB&IT [Horny Ass Bitch & Instructional Trainer] women.

I do not seek to be a Kingu (Great Emissary) but rather am a reluctant and overworked messenger of Free Energy and Antigravity Technologies here on planet Earth as they are necessary to ensure this planet does not end up running a depletion and regard that they ought to be a decisive issue amongst Igigi (Those who see and observe) and am Gibil (one of fire) regarding their advocacy & proliferation. I may not be Enki (Lord of Earth) but am concerned that America acts like Enlil (Lord of Airspace), question whether the Whitehouse is worthy of Eanna (House of Anu) and am concerned about the potential externalities concerning their release. I regard Nergal (our great watcher) and the Anunnaki (those who from Heaven came to Earth) are looking down upon us from a higher plane of being and are ready to assist with our progress upon us self-resolving those of our problems that we are capable of and trust that even with the apparent obstacles these tekknologies impose, seek Sharaku (to give a present or offering).

I feel highly Edis (alone) in this matter and cannot claim to have Ni (an awesome Aura) in such circumstances and most days feel overwhelmed Nasu (to bear) much of the world’s problems due to lack of assistance. I regard the Shebala Tekk as a Duranki (bond between Heaven & Earth) during these perilous times. I am Mummu (one who was born) and though a Starseed do not claim to be Apsu (having existed from the beginning), but do regard I have come into contract with our Anunnaki watchers who Talamu (bestow upon) me many divine insights concerning proper governance of the planet. In particular I regard the prevalence of Free Energy to be Melammu (awe-inspiring luminosity) and prerequisite to our future endurance on planet Earth, and have granted us even a Margidda (celestial chariot) so that we will Mul (shine in the heights) as Galactic Mare Ali (Citizens).

I am a strong believer in the reinstatement of Nanda Umisam (Geoism) upon planet Earth and am a Geolibertarian in terms of my political view. I trust that we must adopt this system on Planet Earth so that we may Ikinnu (be established) and be Malasu (considered equal) as Eribu (those who enter) the heavens must first Belu (extinguish) all forms of systemic iniquity and obey the requirements of our Charter, and have a plan Daku (to be executed).

The media, now as always, is filled with Adaru (fear) and yet I may possess an Igisum (Gift) for creating humour where there was formerly despair and seek to be a force for Damiq (Good). I may not be fully Anzu (one who knows the heavens) but do possess confidence that I can facilitate an interstellar integration with the help of God. I seek to be Resussun (assistance) to the Anunnaki if it is the will of Baraggal (Holy of Holies) but am not for Aguru (hire). I am also concerned that this pursuit may return me to Esharra but it is a risk I am prepared to take for the sake of this Kuan (opening of the heavens) as we Nagiru (herald) a New Golden Age. The Zikru (idea) is to leave behind the systems it will take to transform Humanity into Namlugallu and then return to Eridu (home in the faraway), beyond this planet for the sake of Ankida (joining of the heaven & Earth) and procurement of new planets to fulfill Earth’s needs for expansion as I am Mudu (one who knows) about the needs of this planet and yet don’t claim to be in possession of Immaru (light) on all matters.

The Anunnaki have the capacity to act as our Heavenly Hosts, even offering Ziana (Heavenly Life) and have been our guides throughout the ages. What a disgrace to see them shot off the porch like poachers at a time they come to liberate & illuminate and yet this is not a Dinum (law case). I seek to restore some of the lost Mudutu (knowledge) and clarify the intent of our heavenly overseers as they should be regarded, and hope to Baraqu (strike with lightning) the establishment and it’s deeply held dogmatic assumptions regarding many matters including our need to honour Titaan (those who in heaven live) by obeying the decrees of our Charter which, if obeyed, would bring about great Ulmash (luxury).

As a Rakbu (messenger) I am here to remind humanity that about 1/2 of the Gold on Earth is Anbar (heavenly metal); a remnant from the bestowal of our charter monument, The Great Pyramid of Giza. My we have deviated far from the teachings of our watchers and seem excessively Allik (on the warmarch) and without wisdom or sound cause. As a Zikar (male) I would have sought to spread my seed if the economy was not 6/7 undeclared; comparing only the addition of the undeclared oil reserves with the size of our declared economy. I do not even seek to be an Ensi (Righteous Ruler) on these matters but rather perceive that what I am doing is merely necessary and Parasu (render a decision) that acts as an intersection point between a fallen humanity and those who seek to assist us from above at a time there is a lack of adequate leadership here. The passing of NESARA / GESARA would make me Hadu (Rejoice) and have Barag (Peace of Mind) and the planet Baltu (Splendor) and is something I would like to Dalahu (stir up) support for.

It has been about 5000 years since our period of Kanasu (subdual) and yet would our leaders not need to be subdued to even ensure everyone on this planet can be properly fed and looked after?; there truly is enough, just hoarded in high places. Even if we were to receive such a thing what is to be the Rabu (substitute) for the system we have now if this knowledge is not returned to the people? Free Energy may have more potential than Utu (The power in the Sun) and this technology has been withheld from the public for too long now. It is a matter of financial Bubutu (sustenance) at a time Phony Reserve Banking has settled upon quantitative easing as a solution to the world’s economic woes. I wait upon the Adannu (appointed time) to return this knowledge; endorsed by technology to the people. I seek Epesu (to treat) them to something they will enjoy enduringly and remain La Magiri (unsubmissive) to the Illuminati Bank Cartel [ see ownership ] that has printed this generation and future ones out of a future without intervention. I await Litum (Victory) of the Nuru (Light).

Gosh I Anunnaki
Peterborough, Ontario
Canada

June 12, 2020

Mesopotamian Miniature cylinder imprints of Anunnaki Margidda (Celestial Chariot)
Gyroscopic Antigravity Prototype by ANTEKK

The Generative Process (“Source of New Energy”)

Aisha الأنوناكي

K=2

Speech for Canada

CC:Senators of Canada

On item 8c 2020, community investment and project grants

Hi, my name is George Molson and I’m Earth’s inventor of Free Energy & Antigravity and I’d like to describe the Generative Process for a New Source of Energy, K=2.  Accessing the generative force of the universe was predicted and almost made available to us by Tesla. K=2 with resilience is the result of a 5th dimensional overunity process that is entirely mechanistic; 19:35 . The laws that support this opportunity have been the same since the days of Leedskalnin, will be the same thereafter & are reflective of the automated generative force of the universe.

It is lawful to harness, and should be as it is a machine and so no subjugation of labour is required save that of it’s assembly and distribution which can also be highly automated.

A tekknology like this one mandates liberation from factory labour and so Geoism must be engaged in so labour is not unduly made redundant without proper compensation in the form of access to our natural inheritance (equity in and of all that which is naturally scarce).

Additionally, we advise that an externalities market be developed, procured, and utilized so that the dramatic addition of new energy and acceleration of commercial processes is of sound ideation and deliverance. We also desire to conserve seeds of diverse kinds that have been untouched by Genetic Modification to preserve the genetic heritage of the living library we are a part of.

It’s an exciting time to be alive, and we hope the new-found prosperity it brings will be shared equitably and enhance the lives of all sentient beings 72:4 who are to be partakers in this gift from above, bestowed on us by the Lyrans and other Galactic Neighbours out of unearned grace and compassion for the challenges of our developmental stage and the incumbent but temporary adversity associated with it.

We hope and pray for your Luminosity and evangelism regarding these critical new advancements and hope to raise the vibration and spiritual health of the planet so that our collective safety and well-being will continue to prosper and both ask and plainly petition for the retraction and dismantlement of hostilities that have been with the planet intergenerationally and now have the potential for relinquishment.

Thank you for your time and let’s get this job done. 😉

Thank You,

-George

Starseed Founder of ANTEKK

COnduit OPen, we CANduit

crabwood crop circle 2002

🄯 March 5, 2020 – Channelled by George Molson, notarised by Bebe Rexha @ 19:47

COnduit Cock-Blocked.png
7 Chakras, 23 Chromosomes
2 soulmates = 14 (Love)
8,388,608 Permutations & Combinations

Project Failsafe – FAQ

<goshi.anunnaki@gmail.com>

George Paul Molson

PROJECT FAILSAFE

DISCONTINUED

Why Project Failsafe?

We perceive a need for an alternative to the centralized bank system currently being offered by the global elite and desire to create an opensource decentralized alternative to the now globalized Fractional Reserve Central Banking Model which has become replete everywhere except sovereign native land.

What is Project Failsafe?

An opensource framework for decentralized non-fractional banking. A failsafe system is one that keeps working if the primary system fails. Project Failsafe is here to act as a lifeboat in case instability or hyperinflation occurs in the primary bank system.

Why not Fractional Reserve Banking?

The reason money goes down in value over time (inflation) is that Banks print more, devaluing the currency already in circulation. Banks make money of of something called “The Spread” – the difference between the rate the economy denominated in a currency is growing and the rate the dollar is falling in value. For Example, if the economy is growing at 2.5%/year and money is falling at 3%/year then the spread is 2.5%+3%=5.5%/year. Inflating the money supply is the primary revenue model of banks and constitutes a stealth tax on all resources denominated in the currency being inflated and is typically the largest tax imposed on an economy after Income Tax and in some cases exceeds it. What is inequitable about this is that banks do not offer social programs like the government when it charges income tax but rather the profits from this stealth tax of inflating the money supply are returned to investors. Banks have literally been empowered to print money out of fiat nothing.

Virtually all nations now participate in fractional reserve banking and all are in debt; some quite substantially and a nation in debt is not truly sovereign but rather at the mercy of bankers who can change the policies and priorities of the nation by the terms they set when loaning money to the nation. “Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes it’s laws” — Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild. Today’s banks are centrally owned by a handful of illuminati banking families who collectively own the majority of debt the nations owe them. Ironically, most of the money that the nations are now in debt for was Fiat (printed out of nothing, not backed by any real asset) and the practice of Fractional Reserve Banking is what deprives most nations of their true sovereignty and reduces their financial health reducing the government’s ability to look after their citizens. The situation is so severe in some developing countries that some poorer nations cannot even afford to feed their people due to the amount of bogus debt they have been issued through this iniquitous system. The reason that we describe it as such is that it the money that nations have been given that they now owe with interest was for the most part printed out of nothing so if fairness would prevail the banks could literally be repaid by simply printing unbacked paper money to pay back or cancel their unbacked paper debts. The global banking elite are currently our hidden masters.

What does this have to do with the war and global public safety?

The reason America went to war in the Middle East has to do with oil imperialism and the fact that America, as a corporation, was on the brink of insolvency due to the amount of debt they incurred since the Fed was given its charter.  Executive Order 11110 was issued by U.S. President John F. Kennedy on June 4, 1963 and that would have dismantled The Fed, however his order was never executed; instead he was. The global banking elite possesses modus operandi behind who had incentive to execute him revealing that the global banking elite is literally more powerful than the President in the event the President tries to free the nation from their disastrous influence.

What does this have to do with the PetroDollar?

The primary institutions and families that have profited from the wars in the middle east are the central bankers and do so through something called the PetroDollar. Basically, if someone wants to purchase foreign oil from the middle east they have to do so in US dollars and this artificially increases the price of the dollar. The more the US dollar is worth the greater the extent the Fed can print more money without inflation incurring. This is how American bank owners have profited from the middle eastern oil acquisitions throughout the middle-eastern wars. The most culpable group of people and those who profited the most from the middle eastern wars is a global cabal of international bankers. The reason the US dollar has not rallied as a result of the Petrodollar is that central bankers have simply printed more money at the same time that the dollar would otherwise rally which is how they cashed out their oil acquisitions in the Middle East.

Why Project Failsafe?

The for Project Failsafe is a working remedy for the centralised system we regard the Illuminati global bankers are creating for us. Basically, the established power brokers seek a centralised system where every person cannot buy or sell unless they have an account which is registered with central banks which work together to make one monopolistic global system that everyone has to be connected to either directly or indirectly in order to make a purchase or sale. This results in a system where no one can buy or sell without an account (directly or indirectly) of the central bank and was even foreseen and warned about in the Bible. Religious arguments aside we regard that such a system is not in the public interest as it undermines true choice for consumers and centralises power excessively.

Project Failsafe was a working demonstration of a non-fractional, opensource framework which multiple competing parties can run license free of charge and will act as the place to demonstrate how a working non-fractional financial institute should ideally be run. What makes us different is that we are advocating a non-fractional decentralised system in which true competition exists and consumers have true choice and privacy. We will never issue or require sub-dermal RFID chips which the global elite have already developed and could make mandatory one day, giving unchecked power to the global banking cartel and everyone in our network will have to back all deposits by real assets [ non-fractionally ].

Where will Project Failsafe operate?

Non-fractional currency goes up in value over time at the same rate as the asset backing it, leaving no room for non-fractional inflated currencies to compete with it. For this reason Project Failsafe will only operate on sovereign native land where it will not threaten the safety and viability of fractional currencies which could end in hyperinflation if faced with the threat of honest, fully-backed money. Precautions will be taken, additionally, to prevent excessive holdings from offshore holders that might threaten the safety of regions that are still subject to fractional tender. If a nation’s leaders decide, as The US founding Fathers and John F Kennedy did (and Ron Paul offered to do), that they should exit fractional reserve banking we may work with those leaders to facilitate a smooth transition off of fractional reserve banking.

What are the advantages to having an account with ANTEKK or being a Project Failsafe Participant?

Safety – because your money is backed by a real asset the currency will never experience hyperinflation.

Infrastructure – Upon agreeing to the terms herein stated you will be granted a license of our software (online and ATM) to facilitate the creation of your business. You will rebrand the interface of the website and ATM with your logo and set up business at your own privately owned domain.

Growth – Since accounts at ANTEKK / Project Failsafe Participants will be backed by a globally diversified index fund we predict that the value of our currency will grow at the same rate as the average of the global economy – currently about 4%/year. AVG will be backed by a global index fund with the liquidity of a tender.

Privacy – Accounts at different participating financial institutions using our framework will not be aggregated to a single point as is currently being done with the global illuminati framework currently being created.

I want to start a financial institution that uses your framework, what are the terms and benefits?

Terms: You may not engage in subdermal RFID implants to authenticate your customers. You must back all tenders you offer with a real asset such as Gold or most ideally a globally diversified index fund. You must respect the privacy of your customers and never surrender your private banking details except those required by law or in investigation of a suspicious account.

Benefits: You may use our opensource web and touchscreen ATM software on the terms stated above. You may integrate with one another to facilitate inter-institution transfers by connecting to our network. Other network benefits include guidance, support, and customer referral. We seek to create a healthy “ecosystem” of competing financial services companies so that consumers possess true choice and will actively offer people who sign up at ANTEKK.net the choice of easily transferring to a competing party so as to create a competitive market.

Referrals: All participants in our platform will get visibility and referrals through our network to ensure sufficient balance of power. ANTEKK will be our flagship domain but will actively and automatically allow for our customers to be transferred easily to a competing institution which can offer incentives for switching to a competing organization to ensure that we do not monopolize the market. Diverging from classical business sense we will seek to transfer existing customers to a wider array of competitors to de-monopolize the financial services sector. ANTEKK’s primary revenue model will be licensing Free Energy and our public service will be creating a competitive, non-centralized non-fractional financial services sector.

This is the reason Project Failsafe has been

DISCONTINUED

Is there an alternative to Project Failsafe?

Yes. Nationalising the revenue model of taxing the money supply through Fractional Reserve Banking may be superior to creating something new (if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it). Project Failsafe exists moreso if such actions have already failed.

What will fund Project Failsafe?

Primary funding of Project Failsafe will come from the sale of Free Energy devices and although ANTEKK.net will be registered as a company, sales from Free Energy will be our primary revenue model and used to fund and facilitate the creation of a competitive market for non-fractional banking. ANTEKK will not own ATM’s or run a system unless it is in a region that does not have an existing system such as sovereign native land. Overlooking this policy could precipitate a run on the bank (if it ain’t broke don’t fix it, but do nationalise it).

Nationalisation of existing systems will be our first line of defence against the Illuminati bank cartel. Engaging in project Failsafe will not be our first recommendation to the nations but rather that they nationalise the process of printing money. Project Failsafe is a Failsafe system (what to do if this initial action fails; a lifeboat). This decision comes from the realisation that the current banking market has unduly jeopardised political stability, national sovereignty and public safety and so we seek to enter the financial services market only to create a competitive market of actors that do not adversely affect the political sovereignty or best interest of nations.

Antekk will rely on Free Energy to retain its solvency and will be an opensource solution provider to the nations and will not own or profit from the “franchises” / partners who are participating. We will make the vast majority of our profits licensing Free Energy and create an industry of financial service providers that will make a normal amount of profit, diverging from the current highly profitable, highly exploitative oligopoly of institutions engaging in and facilitating fractional reserve banking currently and only if nationalisation has not provided an adequate solution.

What do your touchscreen ATM’s look like?

Tell me more about the Global Banking Elite:

“The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance” – Irish statesman John Philpot Curran

“They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” – Benjamin Franklin

“Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes it’s laws” — Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild

“The financial system has been turned over to the Federal Reserve Board. That Board as ministers the finance system by authority of a purely profiteering group. The system is Private, conducted for the sole purpose of obtaining the greatest possible profits from the use of other people’s money” — Charles A. Lindbergh Sr., 1923

“Every Congressman, every Senator knows precisely what causes inflation…but can’t, support the drastic reforms to stop it [repeal of the Federal Reserve Act] because it could cost him his job.” — Robert A. Heinlein, Expanded Universe

“The few who understand the system, will either be so interested from it’s profits or so dependant on it’s favors, that there will be no opposition from that class.” — Rothschild Brothers of London, 1863

“All the perplexities, confusions, and distresses in America arise, not from defects in the Constitution or confederation, not from want of honor or virtue, as much as from downright ignorance of the nature of coin, credit, and circulation.” – John Quincy Adams

“I see in the near future a crisis approaching that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. As a result of the war, corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth is aggregated in a few hands, and the Republic is destroyed. I feel at this moment more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war. God grant that my suspicions may prove groundless.” – Abraham Lincoln, from a November 21, 1864 letter to Colonel William F. Elkins

 “Banking was conceived in iniquity and born in sin. Bankers own the Earth. Take it away from them but leave them the power to create money, and, with the flick of a pen, they will create enough money to buy it back again. Take this great power away from them and all great fortunes like mine will disappear and they ought to disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to live in. But, if you want to continue to be the slave of the bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let the bankers continue to create money and control credit.” – Sir Josiah Stamp, President, Bank of England (2nd richest man in England)

 “By this means government may secretly and unobserved, confiscate the wealth of the people, and not one man in a million will detect the theft.” – Lord John Maynard Keynes, “Economic Consequences of Peace”

 “Every effort has been made by the Federal Reserve Board to conceal its powers, but the truth is that the Federal Reserve System has usurped the government. It controls everything in congress and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will.” – Louis McFadden, Chairman of the House Committee on Banking and Currency

 “For a long time I felt that FDR had developed many thoughts and ideas that were his own to benefit this country, the United States. But he didn’t. Most of his thoughts were carefully manufactured for him in advance by the Council on Foreign Relations One World Money Group. The United Nations is but a long range, international banking apparatus clearly set up for financial and economic profit by a small group of powerful One-World revolutionaries, hungry for profit and power. The One-World government leaders and their ever close bankers have now acquired full control of the money and credit machinery of the U.S. via the creation of the privately owned Federal Reserve Bank.” – Curtis Dall, Son-in-Law of F.D.R., 1936

 “History records that the money changers have used every form of abuse, intrigue, deceit, and violent means possible to maintain their control over governments by controlling money and its issuance.” – James Madison

 “I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a monied aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing power of money should be taken away from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.” – Thomas Jefferson

“If all the bank loans were paid up, no one would have a bank deposit, and there would not be a dollar of currency or coin in circulation. This is a staggering thought. We are completely dependent on the commercial banks for our money. Someone has to borrow every dollar we have in circulation, cash or credit. If the banks create ample synthetic money, we are prosperous; if not, we starve. We are absolutely without a permanent money system. When one gets a complete grasp upon the picture, the tragic absurdity of our hopeless position is almost incredible – but there it is. It is the most important subject intelligent persons can investigate and reflect upon. It is so important that our present civilization may collapse unless it is widely understood and the defects remedied very soon.” – Robert H. Hemphill, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

 “In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value. If there were, the government would have to make its holding illegal, as was done in the case of gold. The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves. This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists’ tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the ‘hidden’ confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights.” – Alan Greenspan, Gold and Economic Freedom

“Power concedes nothing without demand.” – Frederick Douglass

“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government, all under their control. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.” – Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976

“The eyes of our citizens are not sufficiently open to the true cause of our distress. They ascribe them to everything but their true cause, the banking system; a system which if it could do good in any form is yet so certain of leading to abuse as to be utterly incompatible with the public safety and prosperity. The Central Bank is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the principles and form of our Constitution.” – Thomas Jefferson

“The Federal Reserve banks are one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever seen. There is not a man within the sound of my voice who does not know that this nation is run by the International bankers.” – Congressman Louis T. McFadden (Rep. Pa)

 “The few who understand the system, will either be so interested in its profits, or so dependent on it’s favors, that there will be no opposition from either class.” – Rothschild Brothers of London, 1863

“The high office of President has been used to foment a plot to destroy the American’s freedom, and before I leave office I must inform the citizen of his plight. We are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence…” – John F. Kennedy at Columbia University, 1963

“The Illuminati bankers rule the world through debt, which is money they create out of nothing. They need world government to ensure no country defaults or tries to overthrow them. As long as private bankers, instead of governments, create money the human race is doomed. These bankers and their allies have bought everything and everyone.” – Henry Makow

“The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that was ever invented.” – Major L.B.Angus

 “The study of money, above all other fields in economics, is one in which complexity is used to disguise truth or to evade truth, not to reveal it.” – John Kenneth Galbraith, in his book “Money: Whence It Came, Where It Went”, 1975

“The Federal Reserve is answerable to no one.” – Ronald Reagan

“The Great Depression was not accidental, it was a carefully contrived occurrence. The international Bankers sought to bring about a condition of despair here so that they might emerge as rulers of us all.” – Louis McFadden  

“The only thing that is neccessary for evil to triumph is for men of good will to do nothing.” – Edmund Burke

Banksters – Do Not Empower to Travel beyond the light-speed framework

( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Declaration of Sovereignty – Oct 8, 2014

Red_Moon_PNG_Clip_Art_Image

POA Court <poacourt@peterborough.ca>

Wed, Oct 8, 2014 5:15 AM

 

DECLARATION OF SOVEREIGNTY

 

I, Goshi Anunnaki, unsigned agent of the legal title GEORGE PAUL MOLSON, declare myself a sovereign bound only by the single statute of lawfulness within the constraints of the human condition effective when the Moon enters the penumbra of the Earth tomorrow night on This Planet (approximately now).

This decision comes from a recognition that I do not have the means to comply with a large list of statutes that no common man among us could be aware of all, and I have already been issued a ticket for which I did not even know the existence of 4/5 statutes in question, nor do I believe that they should exist, and so would like to be transparent in my inability to comply with all the statutes of the state, but rather the single statute of lawfulness that is written upon our heart.

I offer you a document for your notarization of my Shebala (Starship) Tekknology and my formal endorsement for the indigenous people of all Kanatas (Globally) to build and use for personal or public use within their cultures. This formal declaration is for the payment of reparations owing due to the uncorrected errors of our forefathers. Please accept it in absence of the unlawful portion of the tickets you have issued me, as I do not seek to finance unlawful statutes, but will more than willingly offer you something of much greater value as it addresses the unpaid debts of the Financial Entity occupying the land that I was born on. I do not intend to waive any future patent rights by virtue of sharing this technology with you, but rather am giving it to you to notarize and disclose to the indigenous people within Canada.

-Goshi Anunnaki

<goshi.anunnaki@gmail.com>
Canada (The Occupation), Planet Earth

P.S. Several Months ago I requested and was denied a single folder of notarization for both my Patent and for the Key to the City (see The Brock Rock) at the Courthouse, the Police station, and City Hall… What law is there when no government agency is willing to keep any records but their own?

The “First Principles” Libertarian Model

&nbsp;

link_banner_libertarian_quiz

&nbsp;

This is a continuation of The Cause of Inequality in “Free-Market” Capitalism

The American Heritage Dictionary defines a libertarian as follows:

“One who advocates maximizing individual rights and minimizing the role of the state”

Put plainly, libertarianism is a school of thought that values civil liberties and free markets as opposed to government intervention on both personal and economic issues, and demands that governments and businesses be held responsible for all major externalities that they create. Following these principals I would like to put forward that responsible government should address any externality that it is responsible for creating, including those resulting from the creation of private property entitlements. This will surely come as a major divergence from the sentiments of many “classical” libertarians who rightly acknowledge private property as a basic personal freedom, however, I strongly maintain that in order to stay true to libertarianism’s primary emphasis of individual rights, we must be sure to uphold the rights of everyone.

To avoid confusion with the views of many other libertarians who may disagree with this model that I am putting forward, I would like to call this model the ‘first principles libertarian model’, as it returns to the first principals of civil liberties and government accountability for all externalities that it creates. For the purpose of this paper I will refer to traditional libertarianism that offers no remedy for the externalities created by private property entitlements as ‘classical’ libertarianism.  It should be pointed out that the first principles model is also consistent with historical inequalities; historically land was held in commons and great inequality was created as the commons were enclosed. It is also true that, in most cases, little or no compensation was offered for the lost equity in land as it was privatized, and the modern welfare state arose only later out of the recognition of the inhumane inequality that resulted.

I would like to offer that the first principles model has the potential to address the major criticism of classical libertarianism, namely that if brought to its logical ends and all government taxes except for the military were eliminated, and a purely laissez-faire economic model was adopted, income disparities would rise well above current levels, countless people would starve, crime would go out of control, and civil society would cease to function.

There are several places in the world which bear a greater similitude to the classical libertarian economic model than most developed nations. They are countries where taxes are significantly lower and there are few government sponsored social programs, and it has consistently resulted in poorly educated populaces, tremendous economic disparity, and heavily armed gated communities for the rich while many people live in squalor. It did work in America while they had free land to give out, however excessive economic inequality arose in subsequent generations and the modern welfare state was demanded. I regard that if the system had paid it’s private property externalities the residual wage it would have created would have been a superior solution.

Metabolic Thresholds – The Importance of Dose & Schedule

Warfarin_ball-and-stick_model

Rat poison is Warfarin, so what benefit could it be to humans? At the correct dose and schedule it can treat blood clots and acts as a blood thinner beneficially.

From Wikipedia:

Warfarin, sold under the brand name Coumadin among others,[1] is a medication that is used as an anticoagulant (blood thinner).[4] It is commonly used to treat blood clots such as deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism and to prevent stroke in people who have atrial fibrillationvalvular heart disease or artificial heart valves.[4]

What is of more relevance is that almost all substances with an active ingredient have the same properties to a varying degree. In the same way if you were to drink half a glass of wine daily it would probably be advantageous to your health as the body can metabolise alcohol at a low dose, but take too much quickly and it acts as a toxin. Staying below the metabolic rate can turn vice into virtue in terms of it’s effect on the body.

Before 1914 in America all drugs were allowed and when current drug policies were recommended the medical establishment responded by explaining that this was an attack on generic [ patent expired ] medicine. It was already established that cocaine-hydro-chloride was the most effective treatment against melancholia (now known as depression).

If you’re wondering why the “sky did not fall” when these drugs were legal, it’s because when something is legal it’s issuer is liable and this helps to ensures that providers only sell drugs within their metabolic threshold and that accurate information is provided (if the correct framework is in place).

Additionally at the correct dose and schedule receptor loss was not experienced which is what creates the debilitating side-effects if taken at a higher, toxic dose. Metabolic rates were issued in accordance with BMI [ Body Mass Index ] and metabolic threshold was determined by multi-regression, measuring long-term receptor loss. What this plot and line of best fit established is that receptors only denature when a toxic dose is reached.

Other medications that were used before prohibition of drugs also reveal:

1280px-LSD-2D-skeletal-formula-and-3D-models

  • LSD (Lysergic Acid Diethylamide) at low dose increases neuro-plasticity (the brains ability to learn new information) and is only a hallucinogen at a dose orders of magnitude higher than what is needed to improve memory

Cocaine-from-xtal-1983-3D-balls

  • Cocaine-Hydrochloride at a low dose (that takes about a month to accumulate in the human body) is an effective antidepressant,  performance enhancer (increases memory, focus, drive, and hand-eye coordination and performance in sports) and was included at a dose of 9mg / bottle in Coca-Cola for nearly a century.

Heroin-from-xtal-horizontal-3D-balls

  • A low but regularly administered dose of Heroin (Diamorphine) helped patients recover faster from emotional pain, whereas morphine was found to be more effective for physical pain. It was widely used for patients who were experiencing bereavement before prohibition. The metric used to determine its proficiency was days absence from work after bereavement of spouse or child. I think that’s about as objective a metric as can be used.
    800px-methamphetamine2
  • Methamphetamine  [ sold as brand name NoBull™ and was available in any quantity before prohibition; Cattle Tranquilliser added to water ] is a chemical compound that binds to and activates both sigma receptor subtypes, σ1 and σ2, in the brain and like it’s chemical cousin Methylphenidate (Ritalin) blocks the dopamine transporter resulting in accumulation of FOSB if taken above the metabolic rate which determines its toxicity. Adjusted to the correct potency it also treats ADD and was used for the same purpose before it’s more newly patented alternative Methylphenidate (Ritalin) became the approved treatment (formerly Methamphetamine was used because it was more effective and had less side effects adjusted for efficacy but its also true that it was used far less and was not as heavily marketed). Dose and schedule for both Meth’s determine toxicity and both can be taken without major long term side effects if taken below the metabolic rate and act as a stimulant increasing concentration. It appears that the one with an active patent received more political support and the generic got outlawed. Can you guess why?

Current policy is possessed by a black and white thinking fallacy that drugs are either good or bad rather than determining at what dose and for what condition to determine what is advisable. It’s kind of like asking whether shiny metal objects are good or evil – more needs to be known before we can establish what would constitute sound discernment.

How did we get into this mess? There is a clinically bad interaction between money and medicine in the current system.

98235382-money-and-medicine-medicine-pills-or-capsules-vitamin-with-money-dollar-medical-or-pharmacy-prescrip

<update>

 

I did my research and came to a similar conclusion several years ago. It’s amazing to see such videos come into being and gives me hope that this planet is still capable of being objective in some amount.

– George

George Molson
Founder of ANTEKK

</update>

A Modern Resolution to The Enclosure of The Commons

enclosure of the commons.jpeg

An introduction to Geoism (which can be applied to any resource possessing natural scarcity)

There is an underlying inequality that goes unrecognised in modern free-market capitalism, however its source is not regarding free markets, but the establishment of private property. The problem can be understood as follows: Imagine that you have an area of land that a group of people are occupying as a commons. Before the establishment of private property everyone has equal access to the land and therefore it can be said that they have equal equity in the land. Now imagine that the government intervenes and decides to privatise a part of that land. By virtue of doing so the government has given exclusive occupancy rights to a single holder, and taken away the occupancy rights of every other person without giving them fair compensation (commonly known as the enclosure of the commons). An underlying inequality has therefore been created by government intervention and the disenfranchised masses should be compensated for their lost equity from the property that they were formerly able to occupy freely, but no longer can. A simple solution to this problem does, however, exist; if the value of the private parcel of land can be evaluated and the market rate of return is known, then the private parcel of land should be taxed annually or monthly at the market rate of return (the rental value of the property) and the proceeds of this tax should be divided amongst everyone else who can no longer use the land as compensation for lost accessibility. The implications of this model are far reaching. Surprisingly, even if it [ applied to all resources of natural scarcity ] were used as a substitute for all other taxes, it would create a more equal distribution of income than most modern nation-states currently exhibit, and generate a higher economic growth rate not a lower one. The discovery of this underlying inequality is not entirely new, but was rather first recognised by the late economist Henry George who wrote a book in 1879 called Progress and Poverty.

One of the major implications of this model of “taxation” is that by virtue of offering a mechanism for redistributing income in the form of a residual income it offers the possibility of implementing a fully market-based approach for determining spending for items such as health-care, education, and pensions in place of existing centralised government decisions and offers the option for expenses to be voted on whether to be public or private and for the remaining income to be given directly to the people. For example, if a person were sick, disabled, in need of funds for education, or retired and requiring additional income, they could simply choose to occupy land with a lower than average market value, and would receive a residual income from the other property-owners as compensation for using less than their share of property. I would like to point out that a person occupying a property of average value pays no net tax under this model. It should also be noted at this time that such a tax would not be applied to all private property, but only those resources that occur naturally, and not the portion of the value of goods that have been appreciated due to labour activity or value-added processes. The rational being applied here is that since no person is responsible for creating natural resources, no person or group of people should have an exclusive claim to them, but rather equal equity should be assumed.  Labour, on the other hand, is created at the discretion of individuals and is considered the produce of their efforts or capacity and therefore should not be taxed. I additionally recommend that the residual income created from the payment of private property externalities be protected to deter predatory lending that has become replete. It is recognised that for the purposes of utility and practicality private property does need to be allocated, but should only exist with proper resolution of the aforementioned inequality. Ironically enough, if the government does only this it can potentially enhance the economy by creating a framework that facilitates fair exchanges. Given that the government has a monopoly on the use of force, the underlying inequality should be considered an externality of government intervention.

Contrasting this with the current policies of most developed economies, current fiscal policy unduly taxes labour (through income tax) while ignoring the inequalities created by the creation of private property entitlements. This results in the artificial depression of labour rates while temporarily raising return on capital. Seen from the perspective of demographics it keeps the relatively small portion of people who derive the majority of their income from the ownership of capital artificially higher, while keeping the wages of the majority of people who work for their income artificially lower- a scenario which is both inequitable and falls short of its meritocratic claims. It is also absolutely true that the modern welfare state emerged from the system’s inability to pay the externalities of its own enclosure, and had it even cleared its own bill, we would need it to do far less.

To summarise, governments are responsible for creating the single largest cause of inequality, by virtue of not correcting the externality of their intervention in creating private property rights and attempt to remedy the economic inequality that results from this by unduly taxing labour, which is little more than a cosmetic remedy for a deep underlying problem, and artificially depresses labour rates and artificially [and only temporarily] raises return on capital. If left unchecked it will result in an ever-growing disparity between the rich and the poor, of which there is already great empirical evidence for. Finally, the most promising thing that this system offers is a stronger pressure towards automation and a society where the machines work for the living instead of the living working for the machine.

The only thing that the system ever had to do was pay its own externalities – the alternative is for it to be the author of inequality while claiming to be a corrector of it, and yet this insight can lead to its sound resolution.

Rough numbers on how much the Residual Income  would be in America

[ Resulting from Applying Geoism to Oil Globally ]

1-time payout:

$1,739 Trillion in oil [2014] / 7.53 Billion people = $230,942.89/person 
( less cost of extraction & refinement but not shipping ).

At 53 years of known energy reserves @ current rate of consumption and cost ($33T/annum) that means that global known energy reserves are worth $1,739 T. That’s 7x more than the CIA appraisal of the total declared economy with the value of energy alone. There is a lot more wealth than reported!

BP Says The World Only Has 53 Years Of Oil Left, Should You Panic? [2014]

With consideration for Future Generations:

If a 1-time payout were made on Oil it would leave this generation with an advantage over future generations. I therefore advise that the newly nationalised wealth be used to purchase a perpetuity. In order to do this we must convert an asset into an income stream and so will apply the market PE (Price/Earnings) assuming a PE ratio of 20-25 (22.5 being the average) to create a residual wage that will pay future generations. A price-earnings ratio can be likened to the ratio between the value of a chicken to a farmer vs. the cost of their eggs.

from above: $230,942.89/person [price ] / 22.5 [ Current Market PE ratio ]
= $10,264.13 / person / annum [ residual earnings / year ]

I strongly advise this option as it will offer more promise to future generations. Also as world population rises the residual income / person from this stream will fall (inversely proportional to expansion of population).

See Also: Barrel Breakdown –

[ Resulting from nationalising The Federal Reserve ]

US total debt $73T [2019] @ 4% interest/annum (the long-term interest rate when America was free [before the Federal Reserve Act of 1913]) = $8,984.62

$8,984.62 /person / year from nationalisation of the Fed

“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated governments in the civilised world. No longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.”
~ Woodrow Wilson
(1856-1924) 28th US President
Attributed. In reference to signing the Federal Reserve Act in 1913.

[ From Applying Geoism to land private property entitlements: ]

The total value of the land that makes up the contiguous United States was $23 trillion dollars in 2009, according to new data [PDF] released by the United States Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). That amounts to roughly 160 percent of U.S. Gross Domestic Product for that year, which stood at $14.5 trillion:

$23,000,000,000,000.00 US land valuev ($23T)
325,000,000 (US Population)
$707,692.31 raw land  value/ person
@4% (market rate of return in America during years of Freedom [ before Fed Reserve act of 1913]) = $2,830.40/person/annum
@2.5% (market rate of return under the Fed) = $1,769/person/annum

In America it would result in a residual income of $1,769.19/year /person:

The market rate of return is about 2.5% in America, so it’s actually 2.5% x the Total Land Value. Taxing all resources of natural scarcity (Geoism) at the market rate of return is the exact equation necessary to prevent monopolisation. If this was practised historically land values would have been lower (property would be more affordable) but since it was not mortgages are now larger than they should be.


I believe if property started to be taxed at the market rate of return then the market will no longer result in one winner (like a game of monopoly), which would be beneficial. If we started taxing property this way the market rate of return would lower, labour rates would go up, then the markets would fluctuate and stabilise at the correct rate and the result would be a greater degree of automation with the machines working for the people instead of people working for a system which disenfranchises them. 
I am concerned that this would be highly disruptive, so maybe it would be better to try on native land or somewhere that doesn’t have a system yet so that the new system can be developed?
[ I invite you to do the math on applying Geoism to other sectors like wireless spectra, airspace,  other natural resources to complete the process of de-enclosure. ]
[ Additionally I advise that an externalities market be established to compensate for health-loss due to pollution, wireless communications, etc. ]
Facebook Comments:
Dan Sullivan That data is useful for attracting Basic Income advocates, which is certainly worthwhile. Those numbers would change if we began collecting land rent, but cheaper land is as big a benefit as the basic income itself.
Douglas McLain I’d like to see a global tax on all natural resources, not just land. For example, the Alaska Permanent Fund Tax on oil pumping. Also James Hansen wants a global tax on carbon emissions as a way to help avoid global warming. Distribute the money to everyone as an Earth Citizens Dividend. How much could the ECD be?https://youtu.be/PWq4TTI_DNw

Nelson Guedes I think this topic [ Federal Reserve ] is actually fairly important for the LVT discussion, considering that the private banking system facilitates the inflation of land cost by lending more and more money for mortgages. 

Cracks Along the Seams

Western civilization may seem to be in a great position of dominance but cracks along the seams are starting to emerge. The growing tension between Western nations and many middle eastern countries should be seen as an early warning that our intervention is not always welcomed (to say the least). Our modern day bureaucracies have become corrupt and now pay little more than lip service to the ideals of liberty and freedom that have defined our founding constitutions. Growing prison populations, often for victimless crimes are a tremendous eyesore to the ideals of freedom and liberty. Overextention of intellectual property, and government created monopolies are impeding innovation and missing key opportunities to improve the way that information is disseminated globally, and is reducing the scope of what our democracy could be. Drastic environmental destruction is taxing our biosphere to levels that are most likely unsustainable, creating an environmental debt that we are leaving to future generations. Falling real wages for most people, and the growing disparity between the rich and the poor, not just within Western nations but globally are early warning signs of systemic problems with the prevailing economic paradigm, and left to its own devices will result in growing tensions between economic classes. Government and corporate collusion has given birth to the now prevalent fractional reserve banking system which, with the endorsement of the IMF, has been reproduced globally, and opens up economies to currency failures while depleting the reserves that define the real value of any promissory note.

It’s time for the West to return to the age-less wisdom of the principles of self-ownership, responsibility and personal liberty. They are not only values that have, at times, defined us, but will sustain us in the future by offering pragmatic solutions that can be realistically implemented.

Intellectual Property, Telecommunications and the Artificial scarcity of Wireless Bandwidth

sats_large

For almost 40 years the sole phone company in America offered nothing but a black telephone. This is because Bell Telephone was a government protected monopoly. The technology required to create a wireless telephone network was experimented with by Nikola Tesla as early as 1900, and the technology to implement a wireless telephone network existed shortly thereafter but could not be implemented due to the government enforced monopoly resulting from the very broadly defined patent on the phone. This is an example of how the overextension of intellectual property rights, and excess government intervention is capable of blocking critical developments in society. The lesson here is that while intellectual property rights can offer incentives for greater research and development, the overextension of intellectual property rights can be an impediment to innovation. Care should be taken to ensure that intellectual property rights do not over extend their value to society.

Even in today’s supposedly competitive telecommunications market, there exists a tremendous potential to implement policies that would radically advance the internet, telecommunications, and the method of mass media dissemination. This potential lies in opening up the wireless bandwidth, a resource that is over 90% unutilized and is kept artificially scarce in virtually every nation as a result of government intervention. If even an additional 5% of the wireless bandwidth was opened freely it would almost instantly open the option for very affordable (by today’s standards) high-bandwidth wireless internet access to become ubiquitous. Such a move would open the possibility for anyone to access almost unlimited DVD-quality television programming via the internet at a very low cost, and  nearly unlimited phone bandwidth would drop the cost of making phone calls (even globally over the internet) to being almost free. Moreover, since anyone could create their own internet radio station or television station, it would create a dramatic democratization of the media and revolutionize the nature of the internet. It should be noted that some of these measures are already being realized to a smaller extent, however the cost of wireless internet bandwidth is still far too high to be a viable replacement for cable TV, and cell phone bandwidth is absurdly overpriced given the availability of unallocated wireless spectra. Such a move would deeply cut into the profit margins of the major media providers and telecoms who are heavily dependent on the artificial scarcity of bandwidth, and its resulting effect of raising the cost of advertising space today.

Several explanations of why governments may be so reluctant to open the wireless spectrum exist. The best that I have heard is that keeping bandwidth artificially scarce creates monopolies that generate tremendous profit due to the lack of true competition. These monopolies pay large sums of taxes to governments, making it counter-productive for governments to cut off their own source of revenue. In this sense governments act in their own self-interest, even against the interest of the public, of which it is their supposed purpose to serve. Another reason that governments may be reluctant to open the wireless spectrum is that it would create a radical decentralization of the media, making it harder to control. In both cases opening up the wireless spectrum would bring tremendous benefits to the public, both economically and in providing easier access to the media. If it is true that “freedom of the press belongs to those who own one”, then it is also true that democratization of the media would hold broad implications in favour of democracy. For example, it would become far easier for many small groups to form their own media outlets and access a very large (global) audience with far fewer barriers of entry.

1974 Medical Study – Cannabis Cures Cancer

&nbsp;

Cannabis in scanning electron microscope

Injecting mice with lung cancer with cannabinoids retarded tumor growth. The effect was dose dependent.

marijuana
&nbsp;

The National Cancer Institute did a follow up study in 1975:

 1975 Sep;55(3):597-602.

Antineoplastic activity of cannabinoids.

Abstract

Lewis lung adenocarcinoma growth was retarded by the oral administration of delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC), delta8-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta8-THC), and cannabinol (CBN), but not cannabidiol (CBD). Animals treated for 10 consecutive days with delta9-THC, beginning the day after tumor implantation, demonstrated a dose-dependent action of retarded tumor growth. Mice treated for 20 consecutive days with delta8-THC and CBN had reduced primary tumor size. CBD showed no inhibitory effect on tumor growth at 14, 21, or 28 days. Delta9-THC, delta8-THC, and CBN increased the mean survival time (36% at 100 mg/kg, 25% at 200 mg/kg, and 27% at 50 mg/kg, respectively), whereas CBD did not. Delta9-THC administered orally daily until death in doses of 50, 100, or 200 mg/kg did not increase the life-spans of (C57BL/6 times DBA/2)F1 (BDF1) mice hosting the L1210 murine leukemia. However, delta9-THC administered daily for 10 days significantly inhibited Friend leukemia virus-induced splenomegaly by 71% at 200 mg/kg as compared to 90.2% for actinomycin D. Experiments with bone marrow and isolated Lewis lung cells incubated in vitro with delta9-THC and delta8-THC showed a dose-dependent (10(-4)-10(-7)) inhibition (80-20%, respectively) of tritiated thymidine and 14C-uridine uptake into these cells. CBD was active only in high concentrations (10(-4)).

PMID:
1159836

Some people have trouble reading medical literature. Here’s what they are saying:

Lung cancer growth decreased when mice were fed: delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC), delta8-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta8-THC), and cannabinol (CBN), but not cannabidiol (CBD)

After 10 days the tumors growth slowed down depending on dose given. After 20 days primary tumor size decreased.

Cannibinoids were effective in treating one type of leukemia (friend) but not another (murine leukemia)

Verify that what I am saying is true:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1159836

See Also:

Emerging Clinical Applications for Cannabis and Cannabinoids: A Review of the Scientific Literature.