“Seek first the Kingdom of Heaven and live righteously and all things shall be added”
This document is an explanation of the insight I have made regarding what I believe to be the correct way of producing Antigravity if we have enough faith and resources to develop the device and explains why I believe it to be correct.
The insight came to me when reading Engineer through the looking glass, as the authors’ experiments on gyroscopics provided the basis for my hypothesis and his videos the very evidence for why it should work. The author, Professor Eric Laithwaite [ inventor of maglev], was in search of and in faith of a principle whereby a 1-way force could be created using gyroscopes, and identified the most critical component to making the technology work which he identified as the “Jabberwock” – the connection and contradictions between different models in science which reveal that known laws must have exceptions (these formulas are generalisations, Eg. Ohm’s law only applies to DC). We should be eager to discover what these exceptions are and how we might exploit them commercially or for the benefit of mankind and that which is right. We have had complete faith in formulas that have domains of applicability, resulting in negative faith that any exception could exist. Eric Laithwaite’s lectures explain numerous examples of known anomalies, all of which are valid and yet were rejected by the Royal Institute of Science. I still regard him as the most significant pioneer in this nascent field, and I am here to finish what he started.
The solution is as follows:
If a gyroscopic wheel is attached to a shaft that allows it to pivot around a center point with a joint, if exposed to a gravitational force downwards it will attempt to make an orbit around the centre. The stronger the gravity or downward pull on the disk the faster it will attempt to orbit. The reason for this is that the gyroscope wants to maintain a constant elevation in real space and if allowed to orbit it will create an upward lift equal to the gravity or downward force in order to maintain its current path. An orbit is the path of least resistance for it to maintain its albeit angular trajectory. If the gyroscope is not permitted to process it will fall at the downward rate determined conventionally in consistency with Newtonian principles.
[Image found from Google image search]
If an orbiting wheel is forced in the same direction the disk will *lift*. With an abundance of otherworldly potential [potential to take one to another planet] this is not a torque. This is made unambiguous by Laithwaite’s Video Demonstration of what happens when he forces a processing gyroscopic wheel on a spring mount resulting in not only the disk lifting, but the centre shaft registering less weight on it’s spring mount ( Eric Laithwaite’s lecture on gyroscopes part 6/7@ 1:11-1:32).
Additionally, if the arm was locked at a 90 degree angle and the orbiting wheel was forced, it would cause (if enough lateral torque and power are present) the center to rise, demonstrating that the introduction of a sideways force causes a net lift upwards.
The amount of lift produced is equal to the amount of rotational energy used to force the orbiting wheel above the rate required for the disk to maintain its elevation. I regard that this has gone unnoticed as one would typically have to be connected to the ground in order to have something to force the orbiting gyro wheel against, and the lifting disk needs to be constrained from torquing vertically while being forced to process sideways at the same time in order for it to be capable of lifting the centre which will bear the load the thruster will lift and requires high energy.
An orbiting gyroscope is much lighter to lift to the human touch. Why and how is this so?
An additional insight is required as one would have to be connected to the ground in order to have something to force the gyroscopic wheel to process. Two gyro wheels rotating around two centre axes that are not jointed are required. If their wheels are spun fast enough and permitted to process the shafts will start to turn at a rate sufficient to levitate the gyros but no lift will be produced until they are forced to orbit above the rate required for their sustained elevation. Now take the other constrained gyro wheel set equal beside it and spin its wheels the opposite direction. The two devices will now orbit in opposite directions and yet only enough to nullify the mass of the gyros (and not the shafts or a load). Now add two motors (so that the torques they create are balanced) and so that the motors force the two orbits equally and in opposite directions, forcing the orbits against each other so that they do not need to be connected to the ground in order to produce a net upward force.
Gyroscopic wheels on the shaft on the left spin and orbit in the opposite direction as those on the right, resulting in forced orbits that both create a net lift upwards. The orbits are symmetrical and are forced off of each other so that they do not need to be connected to the ground in order to force an orbit.
The entire device will now lift! Since the gyros on each shaft are travelling in are being forced to orbit (in opposite directions) they both lift upwards and it was not necessary to be connected to the ground in order to force their orbits, but rather the two orbits were forced against each other and angular momentum from the motor has been converted to a 1- way action, defying Newton’s third principle (formerly Newton’s third law). The amount of rotational energy required to lift the device is equal to the amount of acceleration demanded by the load it carries. The load includes the gyros themselves (which will process at equilibrium to maintain their elevation but still possess mass). It is recognised that when the gyroscope is orbiting at a sufficient rate for it to maintain altitude and transfer it’s levitated load to the centre shaft and no centrifugal force is present. The load also includes the inertial mass of the gyros and the full weight of everything else. When the gyro shaft is accelerated above the rate required for it to levitate it results in a lift emanating from the centre of the gyro. If the “attempted” lift of the device is not allowed to express itself by virtue of the wheel being locked at 90 degrees, the energy expended by virtue of forcing the orbiting gyro to accelerate (the gyro resists orbital acceleration) is transmuted into upward lift.
This device is very much like a double rotor helicopter only with rotating gyros as blades and the two orbits could very well be spread apart like a dual rotor helicopter if desired. It’s worth pointing out that the most efficient packing geometry is six gyroscopic disks to a shaft, however for illustration’s ease I have used two.
My personal preference would be for a saucer with several forced orbiting gyros acting as thrusters around the perimeter of the saucer with a large view hole in the centre and seats surrounding the view hole. The structure should be made out of something similar to a squashed geodesic dome made out of aluminium and a Kevlar or fibreglass exterior. The thrusters and a wood floor connect to the dome, and batteries or potentially hydrogen power cell to run electric motors that will maintain the speed of the individual gyro wheels (small energy required) and the much larger demand of forcing processions to create lift. It is worth pointing out that at an acceleration of 1 G (the requirement to even maintain elevation terrestrially), the next star system is only months away traveller time due to relativistic time distortion. Six axes of six orbiting gyroscopic wheels can be employed around the perimeter of the saucer with each alternating axis rotating in a different direction.
My patent claim is not specific to any particular type of craft but rather the use of opposing forced gyroscopic orbits to create antigravity that is not dependent on transferring a torque from the ground.
In Memory of Professor Eric Laithwaite
(14 June 1921 – 27 November 1997)
Hope that mass is nullified in gyroscopics can be found in Eric Laithwaite’s lecture on gyroscopes parts 3-4/7 and in Engineer through the looking glass Figures 4.9-4.16, Hope that forcing a procession causes the centre of the shaft to lift can be found in Eric Laithwaite’s lecture on gyroscopes part 6/7@ 1:11-1:32
References:
Engineer through the looking glass
Online:
http://www.gyroscopes.org/papers/Engineer%20through%20the%20looking%20glass.pdf
Hard Cover:
https://www.amazon.com/Engineer-Through-Looking-Glass-R-Laithwaite/dp/0563129794
Eric Laithwaite’s lecture on gyroscopes part 3/7
“No centrifugal force, I can make it rise [by forcing it sideways] and when I do that spring says it weighs less” – Eric Laithwaite
Eric Laithwaite’s lecture on gyroscopes part 6/7@ 1:11-1:32
The full version of this document can be found at:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Km86o2VGIhJGICQfcVasKAyIQAYtzBZ0j6tqR8kt0iA/pub [ html ]
or
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Km86o2VGIhJGICQfcVasKAyIQAYtzBZ0j6tqR8kt0iA/edit [ Google Docs – better formatting ]
©2008
(this posting is an exerpt)
Parting Note: It is worth noting that by varying the output of neighbouring axes symmetrically across three sets of axes, the craft can produce lift up, lift in any direction upward on an angle, or lateral rotation of the craft, all on six axes.
My personal thanks to Tati Edburbizka, Jasmine Virginia, My Friends, My Family, The Government of Canada, the Government of Costa Rica, Joaquin for listening to my idea and helping me personally, My Mom and the Church for supporting me financially through my Anomalies Research.
Yours Very Truly,
George Paul Molson
The Secret
How a Rotational Torque is transmuted into lift
Forcing an processing gyro to orbit faster causes the gyro to lift. If the gyro is restricted from lifting [ in this example by an elastic band ] it will cause the center to lift (similar to putting a yoke on a farm animal)
(video by anisotropicplus Nov 8, 2015)
When the orbits are forced in the assembly, the orbiting gyroscopes produce resistance which they try and release the consumed energy as a lift. Because resistance is incurred when the orbiting gyro is accelerated beyond its default processionary speed [ to maintain elevation ] the energy needs to escape somewhere and this creates an upward lift in the device emanating from the centre of the spinning nullified mass
The thruster is not overunity and the need for the extra energy added to escape results in levitation.
When the orbits are forced in the assembly above their default orbital velocity, the orbiting gyroscopes produce resistance to being accelerated beyond their default orbital velocity. Centrifugal force emanates due to their acceleration above their default orbital velocity and is transmuted into lift, = & @ 90°’s. Since the gyroscopes are not overunity (the law of conservation of energy is maintained) the energy has to be released somewhere.
This creates an upward lift in the device emanating from the center of the spinning nullified mass which is transferred to the center of the orbit thereby resulting in an Antigravity thruster when gyros of each main motors are equally energised in opposite directions. The thruster is not overunity and the need for the extra energy added to escape results in levitation.
Resolution
If an orbiting gyro is exposed to a gravitational force downwards it will attempt to make a procession around the centre if it’s wheels are spinning fast enough. A sideways torque is converted to lift, equal and at 90͐°’s. This is a class DV [Direct Violation] of Newton’s third principle ( formerly Newton’s third law – Like Ohm’s law it has a domain of applicability [Ohm’s Law only applies to DC in the V=IR form]).
The reason that Eric Laithwaite’s work was supposedly debunked is that when Eric Laithwaite stood on a scale and permitted the wheel to process around him it did not reduce his mass on the scale. The only way it could reduce his mass is if he was holding two wheels, one in each hand and to force the procession sideways (laterally) above the default processionary rate [ the rate required to maintain elevation ] while constraining the wheels from lifting, forcing them to lift him on the scale. Also note that high energy is required for this as the same amount of force needs to be exerted sideways as the device is to lift upwards so a powerful motor is required.
Implications
Antigravity is possible but involves transmuting the lateral torque incurred when putting high energy into forcing a gyroscopic procession above the rate it has to orbit in order to maintain its elevation.
Brought to you by:
–五志
Please use this Technology responsibly
( no violence, imperialism or fractional reserve banking )
Shebala Blueprints
A Special Thanks to Polarity Music
ANTEKK is the Earth version of [ 太阳 ][ 公司 ] of Arcturus. Shebala and Free Energy technologies have and are in the process of being channelled from there
ANTEKK - Beyond Belief 
May 20, 2019 at 3:21 am
More related content is available @ https://ANTEKK.net
July 4, 2019 at 1:29 am
My Starseed Mission:
http://ANTEKK.space